Ironic

A vision of giants came to me a little more than three years ago, and till this day this subject interests me, as the giants I'd seen in the vision were taller than the tallest trees.  In the book of Numbers 13:33, we are told man looked liked grasshoppers in the sight of these giants -and according to my vision- this account is accurate.  With the many stories and artifacts in existence can't help but wonder how come they didn't teach us about these giants in school? Could they have been hiding something from us? Well according to the Smithsonian they were. Why else would Smithsonian claim to have destroyed evidence of giant remains? Could it have to do with the fact that it would further validate that God Most High is real?  On Gaia.com I found that the Smithsonian Institution is an "extension of the U.S. Government with congressional members sitting on its Board of Regents". That is protected by congress against lawsuits and is granted immunity from...

It's been a task looking into the ones behind the writing of Ingerscholl Lockwood's books. These books strike more than an "eery" coincidence to me. I somewhat wanted to explore this a bit more. So I did. Here's more of a detailed analysis of my thoughts followed by my choices of supporting evidence. 1. It's either written just after a ritual where they were "channeling" spirits or by an intelligent species that really was driven underground.  2. Either way: it's still written about a species that does exist underground and about the works of deeds on the earth. 3. They like to use this language and actually find it interesting that you are none the wiser. They do call us "cattle" and "sheep" ya know? 4. There's a hidden code to exactly when the America we know now will fall. I've not figured that one out. But, I'm also not in a hurry.   Let's explore: 1.  Channelling spirits  is noth...